This Article part of The Objective Imputation Theory in Criminal Law Series
Among the theories of causation that more importance have, we have the following:
v Theory of equivalence of conditions.
v Individualizing theories.
v Theory of adequacy.
v Theory of adequate causation.
v Relevant theory of causation.
v Theory the ban back.
v Theory of causation.
The following explains the main features of each of the theories mentioned above.
Theory of equivalence of conditions
The theory of the equivalence of conditions is becoming known in Germany from 1843, with Stuart Mall Years later the theory is developed by Von Buri in 1873. Von Buri understand that not only the sum of a variety of elements is cause of a phenomenon, but also each of these forces individually considered in turn causes an outcome. (Reyes Alvarado, op.cit, p.41). The doctrine of the time came to explain that all conditions for the production of an outcome is both the cause of it, so any condition is equivalent to a cause and then comes, just the name of the theory. (Vargas Gonzalez et al, 1998, p.34). Read the rest of this entry »
In most cases, the existence of causation is not problematic. If A throws a stone vase intentionally against B and destroys it, there is no doubt that the operations of A (throwing the stone) and the typical result (intentional destruction of the vase of B), there is a causal link.
Causality
Historical Background
In all there and very abundant, so for those who wish to seek a 
In a recent lecture given in Mallorca, one of the members of the Platform, Angel Luis Ortiz Delgado,
